Chasing anthropocenic consciousness

The implications of what it means to alive in the Anthropocene can be infinitely depressing. While the mainstream view is that the current crisis is because we burn fossil fuels there’s more going on that. The Anthropocene is also about the plastic swirling around in vast ocean gyres, fast fashion waste, pharmaceuticals past their use by date and dumped in landfill sites, types of plastic no one has yet figured out how to recycle, the fact the bees are dying etc. etc… The list goes on and on.

All of these things are effects of our behaviour though. The question is why do we behave in such life destroying ways in the first place? The answer to that question has to be tied up with the way we consider nature to be a resource we can use for our own betterment and how Western consciousness is constructed around the idea that humans are separate from nature.

Just how we break down this way of thinking is matter of conjecture. The feminist scholar, Donna Haraway suggests that one place to begin is make kin with other beings:-

“I first started using the word “kin” when I was in college in a Shakespeare class because I realized that Shakespeare punned with “kin” and “kind.” Etymologically they’re very closely related. To be kind is to be kin, but kin is not kind. Kin is often quite the opposite of kind. It’s not necessarily to be biologically related but in some consequential way to belong in the same category with each other in such a way that has consequences. If I am kin with the human and more-than-human beings of the Monterey Bay area, then I have accountabilities and obligations and pleasures that are different than if I cared about another place. Nobody can be kin to everything, but our kin networks can be full of attachment sites. I feel like the need for the care across generations is urgent, and it cannot be just a humanist affair.” https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/making-kin-an-interview-with-donna-haraway/

I’m finding it difficult to follow logical lines of thought through the impasse of the Anthropocene. I’ve tried writing long blog posts explaining some of the complex ideas I’ve come across but I can’t get anywhere with that approach. I’m thinking the problem might be that such an approach is that is really just continuing to work in the ways of the old system we have been conditioned to believe is the only way things can be. As Einstein said  “No problem can be solved from the same consciousness that created it.”

I’m finding exploring ideas with images and metaphors works best for me right now. If you want to share any art, poetry or writing you have made about this process of finding pathways beyond the fatalism of mainstream anthropocentric thinking please feel free to post a link to your work in the comment section. Communicating with each other is one way to keep our thinking moving.

24 Replies to “Chasing anthropocenic consciousness”

  1. Finding a new way to be will involve dismantling the patriarchy and with that capitalism and I dare say organised religion, all of which holds up Man (the gender-codified being) as above it and us all. To make people in general (all the genders) believe we are of nature, that animals, plants, rivers, oceans have equal right to continue undisturbed, unbefouled will take millenia, and/or the process earth is going through – purging. If humans are to survive this catastrophe we will have to work together, to share food in the first place, shelter, etc. One can’t help respect the process of climate change, of global warming, it’s so much more powerful than us.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Great points. I’ve been thinking about how to make a page a patriarchy. I agree that we will have to work together to get through this. Climate change is a transformative force. We’ll either figure out how to change or we’ll perish.

      Like

      1. Our will to live will make it happen. Mentioning the patriarchy – I can’t get Elon Musk’s face to go away! Lol! It may be the great equaliser? But again Musk (and others) – they already built structures with air conditioning, freezers, space to store food and what they lack they’ll come steal from the vulnerable, including water. What water sources will be available, they’ll guard with guns. Not a pretty picture and it is hard to stay positive and hopeful.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Yes to all of that. But I’m wondering if it really will degenerate into a battle of the Elon Musk’s of this world fighting the poor starving masses. Climate change doesn’t pick sides. It’s indiscriminate in its effects and will become even more so over time. All those rich people in their bunkers will be protected for a while but maybe something else will happen. I’m not sure what. It’s just a feeling. I’ll see where it takes me over the next few posts. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

      3. I also arrived at the thought of “them” being safe in their bunkers – for a while. Food and other resources will run out at some point and they’d have to go foraging and learn about sharing properly. Climate change, like Covid, doesn’t pick sides, you’re right. We missed a great lesson during the years of Covid – already a vague memory.

        Like

      4. I totally agree about us missing the point of Covid. I was completely convinced in 2020 that this was it – people would wake up and we’d work together to change the world. I was so disappointed when it didn’t happen. I think that’s one of the reasons why I got so depressed earlier this year.

        Like

      5. Same here. We went right back into our old behaviour and habits. That’s why Nature is doing it for us, it has to stop. There’s a Steffen – don’t remember his first name, who I follow on Twitter, He stresses how will have to “ruggedize”. Whatever that may mean for individuals. I imagine lack of electricity, air-travel – the whole of what to come is so overwhelming! It’s an apocalypse.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. My eye fell on one inscription in your workbook: “what does it mean to be human at this time?” I’d say it means being humbled. Being shown our destructiveness, our out of control ego : which organised religion (erroneously) gave us: that we are in charge of nature, that all of life is subjected to our use and misuse. We will perish as we lived.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Humbled is a good way to put it. I like your take on ego control being a by-product of religion. I was thinking about that bit in the old testament about god giving man dominion over the Earth today. There’s something about trying to write about this stuff – I have lots of ideas but have some kind of internal blockage when it comes to expressing them clearly – it could well be because of my very strict religious upbringing. Breaking down all these conditioned responses is something I want to explore in these posts. I’d love to read any poetry you write about this.

      Like

      1. Yes, even I have those blockages, also because of a very strict Calvinist upbringing. Being critical or questioning of the Bible wasn’t tolerated at all. Even to this day, speaking with friends who are still in deep religion: the fight-back is often peevish, often aggressive.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I’ve moved away from religious circles and raised my kids outside of that influence. When my dad died my brother decided he had to have a formal religious funeral. I was sitting beside one of my daughters as we listened to it all. She was really restless and kept fidgetting. She told me later that she wanted to jump out and shout out ‘what about the goddess’. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

      3. Wonderful! I remember at my mother’s funeral when I sang, under my breath, Goddess instead of God, Her/She instead of Him/Her. Had no notion of lightning descending from the sky to wipe me out for this blasphemy.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. That Einstein quote is exactly right. Our entire way of interacting has to be thrown out. I’m thinking especially of “economics”, which not only makes no sense, but has as its only goal to make a few select people wealthy while exploiting everyone/everything else. (K)

    Like

    1. Hi Kerfe, I did a bit a research in response to your comment and found a couple of ideas online. One is degrowth and the other is called ecological economies. The article I found on ecological economies has some really good info and I’ll delve into in a later post. First I want to tackle the post about patriarchy that Petru and I talked about earlier in this comment thread. Thanks for your idea of looking at economics. I will get to it but if you want to jump in and explore it yourself here’s a link to the article I found. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/global-sustainability/article/equity-and-sustainability-in-the-anthropocene-a-socialecological-systems-perspective-on-their-intertwined-futures/F6DCBE05CA3F6820A10C0DF193BB29E7

      Liked by 1 person

    2. On second thoughts I realise patriarchy, religion and our current economic system are all intrinsically linked so I’ll tackle them all in my next post. (this could take a few journal pages to unpick!)

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Wow, a conversation on the issue that most distresses me. I am glad i didnt miss it. Unfortunately, the pickle we are in is that the price of capitalism – a resource extractive system – is coming due. But the system knows no other way to be so continues even with the planet in flames. It boggles the mind. It is beyond frustrating to me having watched this disastrous progression for 45 years, to STILL see so little action, so many empty words, from leaders. The domi ion over the earth idea was a bad one. I prefer the aboriginal view that all other life is kin. Thanks for beginning this conversation, Suzanne. We need places where we can share our angst over our plight – knowing what we know, while much of the human population is in denial – even though climate refugees are everywhere.

    Like

    1. You’ve gone to exactly what I’m looking at in the next post which will up today. I’m going to speed up the posting from now as I’ve got a clear idea of what I want to cover now. Hopefully it will be one post a day – usually posted later in the day here so I guess that’s your morning. I’ve written a rough outline of posts this morning and figure it will be another 6. I’ll be taking a deep dive. I’m so glad you’re reading it and thanks for your long comment. Actually reading your bit about the 45 years makes me think there’s another post in that. So let’s say 7 more unless people point to other areas I haven’t thought of. I’m finding this absorbing and exciting. 🙂

      Like

  5. The bills of capitalism are now overdue and unfortunately it is the exploited and vulnerable that will have to pay up first. A great discussion in this section. The idea of growth, not for welfare, but for accumulation of capital is the first barrier to change. Everything I have been reading about degrowth, suggests to me, that it is the most sensible path to take but will it (can it?) be actually implemented is the question. I think your point about viewing climate action not as a reaction but as a responsibility is so relevant here.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m not into the degrowth idea but am interested in ecological economics and participatory economics. I will list some sources in a later post. I am not setting myself up as knowing the answers to these practical matters. What interests me at this point is the psychological, emotional and spiritual impact of living in the Anthropocene.
      Thanks for reminding me of this post. I wrote these posts so quickly I have forgotten some of what I said. I have printed them out today and will read them over the next few days. I seem to have misrepresented my own opinions in some of them I feel. I find this stuff hard to write about because there are so many facets to consider and there is such a cloud of negative emotions around the issues. I will attempt to make my position clearer and perhaps edit this particular post to explain myself better. Thanks for reading anyway.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started